![]() ![]() ![]() This perspective leads to the actual question of architectural history: how the interaction of local and global architectural tendencies and features, the relationship between the centre, semi-periphery and periphery influence the examination of architectural processes and preservation of unique values. These being the Roman Empire, the Ottoman Empire and the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy, all having a determinative influence on the following period’s architecture.Ĭonsequently, the influence of a relatively different culture with global dimensions can be examined within a regional context. The case studies of the article are derived from the architecture of the Roman era (1 st–5 th centuries CE), the Ottoman era (16 th–17 th centuries CE) and the historical industrial architecture of the era of Austro-Hungarian Monarchy (19 th–20 th centuries CE), since the Carpathian Basin, the interference territory of Western and Eastern Europe, Northern Europe and the Balkans, was under the influence of states with centres in a different area. ![]() This paper examines the principle of the architectural-historical process in the territory of the Carpathian Basin in three periods. Rather, this phenomenon is to be understood as an external impulse that influences regional architectural development. As the case studies show, the evoked response does not necessarily have to be negative. ![]() Transferring a building type from its original context (in the sense of genius loci) into a foreign environment for which it was not intended, is equivalent to transplantation. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |